Thursday, February 18, 2016

Town and gown are clashing over proposed development in Takoma Park

Montgomery County's rapidly-growing community college, Montgomery College, wants to expand its northern Takoma Park campus. A number of Takoma Park residents don't like the idea, and are pushing for the college to expand in nearby Silver Spring instead.
Montgomery College sits partially in Takoma Park (inside the red line) and partially in Silver Spring.
Image from Google Maps.
With three campuses in Takoma Park, Rockville and Germantown, Montgomery College serves more than 60,000 students a year, a number that's growing quickly. Its first campus was built in northern Takoma Park in 1950, and in 2004 it expanded by adding new buildings in Silver Spring.
The college's board of trustees recently approved a new Facilities Master Plan for 2013-2023. The Master Plan is full of proposals and ideas for the Takoma Park campus, such as a new math and science center building, a new health and fitness center, and a new library. According to the plan, Montgomery College's Takoma Park campus has more capacity constraints and "obsolete or dysfunctional existing structures" than Rockville and Germantown.
The plan notes that enrollment has increased 18% over the past five years and is projected to increase another 27% by 2023. All of those additional students will need space for classes and laboratories. In order to achieve greater square footage without acquiring any new land, the plan calls for taller, wider buildings to replace the current ones, which are mostly smaller, two-story structures built to blend into the residential character of northern Takoma Park.
All of that has the college wanting to expand the Takoma Park campus, to the tune of over 56,000 square feet.

Renovation
New Construction
Demolition
New Growth
Takoma Park/Silver Spring
9,295
170,532
(113,983)
56,549
In the image below, the six buildings colored in yellow are those planned to be demolished and rebuilt, while the orange building is planned for renovation. It's worth noting that the college's daycare center (located on the right side and noted by the letters "DC") will be closed with no plans to reopen, meaning students with kids and some local parents will need to find a new childcare option.
Maps from the Montgomery College Facilities Master Plan.
Neighbors are opposed, but the college says it can address concerns
At a Takoma Park City Council meeting on January 20, 2016, Montgomery College Takoma Park campus provost and vice president Brad Stewart described the draft master plan to both residents and the council.
According to Historic Takoma, a non-profit organization founded to preserve the heritage of Takoma Park, MD and the Takoma Park neighborhood of DC, the college agreed in writing in 2002 to consult with neighbors and the City Council on any proposed plans that could impact the neighborhood. While Mr. Mr. Stewart claims that two neighborhood discussions about the plan occurred (one in Takoma Park and one in Rockville), neighbors of the college claim that nobody told them.
Members of the City Council sided with the college's neighbors and chided Mr. Stewart about what they said was a lack of coordination on the college's part. Neighbors also complained that the larger, wider buildings contemplated in the master plan would be more appropriately located on the western side of its campus, which borders an urban, commercially zoned area on Georgia Avenue in Silver Spring.
Mr. Stewart tried his best to allay concerns, noting that that Master Plan is not the final document with regard to actual design and construction. He assured the City Council that additional outreach will be done the school hires architects and starts considering building designs.
Regarding the building heights, Mr. Stewart responded that the college's architects heard neighborhood concerns and created setbacks on the top floors of buildings facing neighboring homes.
You can watch residents raise their concerns at the City Council meeting here, beginning around 13:20, with Mr. Stewart's presentation to the City Council starting around 2:02:00.
Residents and the college have clashed before
As noted above, during the January 20th City Council meeting a few local residents alleged that the college failed to conduct adequate consultation with the local community. But deeply embedded in the Master Plan is a section discussing the college's relations with its Takoma Park neighbors that brings into question whether opposing residents' demands about community involvement are reasonable.
Here's the critical part: "New development proposals on the Takoma Park side of Campus are nonetheless still opposed by a vocal minority of neighbors, who insist that the College shift all development to the Silver Spring side of Campus, or acquire new properties along Fenton Street and locate College programs there."

Jokingly referred to as "The People's Republic of Takoma Park," the neighborhood has a rich history as a community that is unafraid to challenge moneyed and other powerful interests. A recent blog post by Granola Park explains that in the 1970s the college sought to condemn and demolish 22 adjacent Takoma Park homes for new school buildings, but neighbors fought and won against the college.
Silver Spring development could be in Montgomery College's future
Interestingly, and perhaps as a result of repeated neighborhood opposition, the Master Plan does gesture towards future development on the Silver Spring side of the campus. The following map shows possible expansion sites:
Three of the four lots above are rather sterile space. The two on the east side of the railroad tracks are a combination of storage buildings, auto body shops and local rental car companies. One lot on the west side of the railroad tracks is a parking lot owned by the college's foundation and the remaining one abuts Jesup Blair Park where the college built a walkway to cross the railroad tracks and connect the campus.
Future expansion into Silver Spring would activate this space and make it more pedestrian oriented, which is great since the college is only six blocks from the Silver Spring Metro station and abuts the planned Met Branch Trail. But all of this would require the college to acquire these lots and then redevelop them, which is more costly and would take longer than to simply redevelop the buildings they currently own.

7 comments:

  1. Thanks for posting, Tony. The college made a huge error in not purchasing the parcels where the self-stores were built, when those parcels became available. I still remember the low-rise buildings that were on the site of the more-southerly self-store up until the '90s. The college could still acquire those properties, if the Burlington Avenue parking-lot parcel, which the Montgomery College Foundation already owns, can't be made to work for a new building. I haven't seen that slice of Jessup Blair Park mentioned as a development possibility but why not consider it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You ask, "Are the neighbors asking for too much from the college?"

    Hell no. They're not asking for enough!

    Mont Col has a 50 year history of bulldozing its way through and around our homes. It signs agreements to work with the city and local homeowners, but then doesn't live up to those agreements.

    The college should expand on the Silver Spring side of the tracks, and along Burlington Ave and Fenton Street...not in the residential part of the neighborhood.

    And they must STOP encroaching on Blair Park. Inch by inch, decade after decade, they take another little slice of our public land for their use.

    No More!
    The college must respect its historic residential neighborhood. If it wants to expand, then it must find suitable space to do that. An historic Victorian neighborhood is not appropriate.

    Mr. Blogger, please don't write such a sophomoric, ill-informed blog again. You haven't lived in Takoma Park long enough to know the history of this issue, and you also didn't taken the time to learn about that history, either.

    Instead of writing something informative, you have insulted your neighbors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So this is the plan as I understand it currently is (existing and proposed): http://i.imgur.com/kVXkuB4.jpg
      I'm just not seeing what you are.

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. Not in the least. The history here is rich and deep and the characterization of MC's efforts to bulldoze the neighborhood are accurate (indeed one historic Victorian was razed, prompting the most vehement of protests to the college's expansion attempts). Worth reading. You can find it chronicled in many and various places/articles/books about TP history, architecture, land use and planning.

      Delete
  4. People are familiar with the history. Unfortunately, some people do not seem to be conversant with the present ....

    ReplyDelete